ScalePoint Research Updated 14 October 2026
Leave research Email me

Free for now

Get the first year of the subscription free

Everything here is free while the research is being built. A paid subscription is planned. Sign up now and you'll get its first year free, plus an email when new tests and prices come out.

Research / Tests / Test 1

Test 1: Reading card acquiring statements

Published

34 AI models read UK card acquiring statements and had to get every fee right. Each answer was scored in pounds and weighed against the model's price per statement.

The task

Read a statement and list every fee, with its amount.

The data

Invented UK acquiring statements with the right answer set in advance, plus faulty ones as traps.

The models

34 through OpenRouter, on routes with zero data retention. The 7 finalists were also run with an expert prompt.

The score

Fees wrong as a share of fee value, against cost per statement.

What I found

  1. 01With the expert prompt, all seven finalists got 0.07% of fees wrong or less.
  2. 02DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at half a cent a statement got close to GPT-5.5 at 25 cents.
  3. 039 of the 34 models weren't usable. They invented fee lines, missed the traps or gave broken answers.
The seven finalists, expert prompt

What would they cost you a year?

Bars show the model cost a year. The hosting and the engineering to run it come on top. Gemini 3.8 Flash rises to about $6,890 a year at 10,000 statements a month when its introductory price ends on 31 December 2026.

Results

Result
Weights
Developer based in
Sort by

Showing 34 of 34 models.

Every model was run with a plain prompt. The seven finalists were run again with an expert prompt, which has fuller instructions. Cost a year uses the expert prompt for finalists and the plain prompt for the rest.

#ModelResultPlain promptExpert promptCost a year
Fees wrongCost per statementFees wrongCost per statement

How these models do on the other tests is on the leaderboard, and where each one is hosted is on Prices.